Back in 2012 Universities UK released The concordat to support research integrity. The document was developed by representatives from UK research universities, funding institutions and government agencies. Among other things, the concordat recommended that employers of researchers should submit annual statements to their governing body outlining activities done with research integrity and research misconduct.
The UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO, and I didn’t know about it either) decided to survey institutions about whether they were submitting these reports. In a survey of 44 institutions that subscribe to UKIRO, 27 responded and 9 of them had submitted the annual reports. Of another 44 institutions that did not subscribe to UKIRO, only 3 institutions submitted those reports. (The survey will be published at a later date, so I do not know the response rate of the non-UKIRO subscribing institutioins.)
As described in this Nature article, there is a difference of opinion on the meaning of should in this context. Not all institutions assumed that should means the reports are required. (I wouldn’t automatically assume it did, but I’d advocate for submitting such reports regardless.)
The survey should provide additional insight once it’s released later this year.