A change to the U.K. Civil Service Law may dramatically restrict the ability of U.K. government scientists to communicate with the media (H/T ScienceInsider). The language would require all media contacts to be approved in advance by the appropriate Minister. The specific language:
“All contacts with the media should be authorised by the relevant Minister unless a specific delegation or dispensation has been agreed which may be for blocks of posts or areas of activities.”
Certainly scientific communication could be handled under a dispensation, but there was none offered when the change was announced. On Friday three U.K. science organisations (the Science Media Centre, the Association of British Science Writers, and Stempra) wrote Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office, for clarification. In this letter the organisations note that many participants in quasi-governmental bodies have to sign on to the Civil Service Code, so the new language may affect more than government employees. (Advisory bodies to government would not be affected, as their communications are covered in the Ministerial Code.)
Similar concerns emerged over how the change in the law affects whistleblower protections. Minister Maude had indicated to a trade union representative that whistleblower protections would not be affected. That union has petitioned the government to reverse the change.
Given the changes in communication practices in Canada where its government scientist are concerned (referenced in the letter to Maude), I can understand the skepticism about the impacts of this change. Given the May election in the U.K., I would not be surprised if this became an issue in some quarters of the British electorate. I don’t think it will swing Parliament to one party or the other, but depending on the local constituency, it may swing a seat or two.