PLoS Currents – An ArXiv for the Rest of Us?

The Public Library of Science (PLoS) has released a series of papers on influenza in what they’re calling PLoS Currents (H/T ScienceInsider)  Presently in beta, Currents is accepting “new scientific data, analyses, and ideas” and encouraging the discussion and analysis of this information.  The material is not peer reviewed as it would be for a regular PLoS publication, but is screened by moderators who are experts in the field at issue.  The idea is that the work posted and discussed in Currents would lead to papers in peer reviewed journals at a later date.

This appears to be a slightly different version of arXiv, a collection of pre-print articles (primarily in physics, mathematics, and computer science) hosted by Cornell.  Submissions are managed in a similar way, and are generally accessible to the public.  A key difference is the themed approach.  Instead of dividing papers by subject matter, PLoS will archive research (not just papers) from several disciplines focused on the same topic.  From the Currents Influenza website:

All aspects of research into influenza are considered. Topics will include (but are not limited to) influenza virology, genetics, immunity, structural biology, genomics, epidemiology, modeling, evolution, policy and control.  Contributions may take the form of observations, data (such as a graph or a table), ideas and hypotheses, or complete manuscripts.

So policy research could find its way into a science journal – excellent.

While the material is hosted by Google, as the PLoS explains on its blog, it is also archived at the National Center for Biotechnology Information.  Hopefully the Currents topics will not be simply reactive, but consider a number of different topics that aren’t breathing down our collective neck.

As the ScienceInsider article suggests, this is not the first time a preprint collection has been suggested for biomedical topics.  Apparently when PLoS co-founder (and current PCAST co-chair) Harold Varmus tried this when he was leading the National Institutes of Health, some scientific societies raised a ruckus and the effort was discontinued.  Hopefully history won’t repeat itself.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s