Maps of Science: Possible Policy Tool?
Posted by David Bruggeman on March 17, 2009
Wired Science highlighted a new effort in “mapping” science – a map representing clickstreams of searches that shows connections between fields. It’s an effort of a team at the Los Alamos National Laboratory that was recently published in PLoS ONE. A main distinction of this work compared to others (examples can be found at Maps of Science and Places and Spaces), is that it analyzes web searches, and other maps have tracked journal citations. Both are useful, but there is an important difference. The citation traffic highlights what scientific communities consider important in their specific fields, and the search traffic focuses more attention on connections between knowledge clumps.
I like this kind of work, and the other mapping exercises like those sampled in the Wired Science post, because I don’t think enough attention is paid to the interrelationships between clumps of knowledge. And because often the research questions that spawn those clumps of knowledge aren’t the same questions as policy questions, maps showing possible connections have the potential to guide policymakers to more relevant knowledge, or to identifying gaps in knowledge, than through a traditional literature search.
This entry was posted on March 17, 2009 at 21:21 and is filed under Author: Bruggeman, D., Hodge Podge, Scientific Assessments. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

David Bruggeman said
Seed Magazine weighed in on the mapping of science, diving more deeply into the differences between the map based on citations and the map based on clickstream data:
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/knowledge_in_real-time/
Maps of Science « Praj's Blog said
[...] David Bruggeman highlighted this pretty graphic from Wired showing connections between research fields: [...]